| Old Articles: <Older 1211-1220 Newer> |
|---|
 |
Entrepreneur
June 2005
Joan Szabo |
Grab Your Opportunity The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 may let family businesses keep more money in the bank.   |
BusinessWeek
May 30, 2005
Robert Berner |
Goodbye, Mr. Chips The case against an Ohio State professor increases the feds' harder line on insider trading. |
Parameters
Summer 2005
Michael H. Hoffman |
Rescuing the Law of War: A Way Forward in an Era of Global Terrorism Terrorists are gaining an astonishing legal edge over US and other armed forces deployed against them. Judicial intervention in the law of war since September 11, 2001 already far exceeds anything ever before experienced, by any nation, in the history of warfare. |
BusinessWeek
May 30, 2005
Brian Grow |
Turning the Tide of Spam How a small Iowa ISP and two antispam attorneys sued junk e-mailers and won a $1 billion judgement. |
ifeminists
May 18, 2005
Carey Roberts |
VAWA Law Polarizes the Sexes, Weakens the Family The Violence Against Women Act represents a frontal assault on both fatherhood and on the integrity of the traditional family. |
The Motley Fool
May 17, 2005
Tom Taulli |
The Perelman Brief The billionaire investor sues Morgan Stanley for dubious advice, and wins. |
Reason
May 2005
Daniel McGraw |
Demolishing Sports Welfare Two court cases could mean the end of publicly funded stadiums. |
Reason
May 2005
Jacob Sullum |
Injustice is Blind Concluding that federal sentencing guidelines violated the Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury because they required sentences to be lengthened based on facts determined by judges, the Supreme Court made the guidelines advisory rather than mandatory. |
Reason
May 2005
Julian Sanchez |
Broadband Battle If a cable company provides high-speed Internet access, is it offering a "telecommunications service" or an "information service"? The future of broadband could turn on how the Supreme Court answers that question. |
Reason
May 2005
Jacob Sullum |
Advertising Dissent Drug warriors back down: A district judge ruled that a 2004 law banning pro-drug advertisements from mass transit outlets was a clear example of viewpoint discrimination and therefore presumptively invalid under the First Amendment. |
| <Older 1211-1220 Newer> Return to current articles. |
